Where a conveyance of land was unclear or ambiguous a judge was entitled to have regard to extrinsic evidence such as that relating to the physical features of the land at that time. Evidence of subsequent conduct could also be taken into account provided it was of probative value in determining what the original parties to the conveyance had intended.
Have you found this article useful?
Let us know if something's wrong
If this article is miscategorised, misleading, incorrect or inappropriate for FreeLegalWeb, please let us know. We'll review the article and, if necessary, take action.
