Archive for October 2010

Comments Off

Court of appeal to decide what is a protected caravan site

29 Oct 2010 By Francis Davey Housing Law

In Brightlingsea Haven v Morris [2008] EWHC 1928 (QB), the High Court considered whether Haven Village in Brightlingsea was a “protected site” within the meaning of the Caravan Sites Act 1968. This is an important question because the Mobile Homes Act 1983 grants a degree of security of tenure to residential occupiers of mobile homes [...]

Read more

Comments Off

Two More Housing Act 2004 Appeals Reach the Lands Tribunal

27 Oct 2010 By David Smith Housing Law

Relatively few appeals to the RPT reach the Lands Tribunal. However decisions in two have recently been published on their website. Hanley v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council is an appeal against the service of a Prohibition Order. These Orders are made under the HHSRS, in Part 1 of the Housing Act 2004, and prohibit the [...]

Read more

Comments Off

Pathway plans and duties

27 Oct 2010 By Dave@nearlylegal Housing Law

In R(A) v Lambeth LBC [2010] EWHC 1652 (Admin) (Claim 1) and [2010] EWHC 2439 (Admin) (Claim 2), Kenneth Parker J considered first whether it was proper for a personal advisor to complete a ChIldren Act 1989 pathway plan, and, secondly, the degree of specificity required in such a plan.  A had a troubled upbringing, having been involved [...]

Read more

Comments Off

HMOs and Council Tax

27 Oct 2010 By Tessa Shepperson Housing Law

A different definition of HMOs Did you know that the definition of an HMO for council tax is different from the one that is used for licensing and similar purposes under the Housing Act 2004. The definition is in Regulation 2 Council Tax (Liability for Owners) Regulations 1992. This states: The following are the classes…

Read more

Comments Off

Landlord wins compensation claim against surveyor

26 Oct 2010 By Tessa Shepperson Housing Law

I was interested to see in the  Observer on Sunday, a report about Emmett Scullion, a buy-to-let landlord, who has won £72,000 compensation from a surveyor who overestimated the rental income the landlord’s property would generate. However although this is a worrying decision for surveyors, it doesn’t mean that landlords can now go out and [...]

Read more

Comments Off

“Could have gone better” corner

25 Oct 2010 By Nearly Legal Housing Law

Just a brief note on a couple of tangentially housing-related cases, both of which serve as illustrations of how not to go about things as claimants and in one case, as a defendant as well. A little cruel, perhaps, as to be human is to err, but the oops factor is irresistible. London Borough of [...]

Read more

Comments Off

Accommodating ‘formerly relevant children’

24 Oct 2010 By Nearly Legal Housing Law

SO, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Barking and Dagenham [2010] EWCA Civ 1101 I’m a bit slow in getting to this one (and the rest of our backlog). We’re all more than a little busy. My apologies. This is the Court of Appeal hearing of a case that first surfaced as [...]

Read more

Comments Off

Power to the people!

21 Oct 2010 By J@nearlylegal Housing Law

NL doesn’t have a vote in the New York gubernatorial election but, if we did, we’d probably cast it for the “Rent is Too Damn High” party. The performance of Jimmy McMillan in the recent gubernatorial debates has become something of a Youtube hit (available here; see also here for a more considered interview). I’m [...]

Read more

Comments Off

Agents renewal commission is unfair says Judge

20 Oct 2010 By Tessa Shepperson Housing Law

After the Foxtons case, many landlords wondered how the courts would treat renewal commission clauses in landlords contracts with their letting agents. A recent case reported in the Legal Action Magazine is interesting. The case is Chesterton Global Ltd v. Finney, Lambeth County Court, 30 April 2010 (it has been previously reported on the Pain…

Read more

Comments Off

Fair limit on damages for ex-TTs?

19 Oct 2010 By Nearly Legal Housing Law

Chase v Islington LBC Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court 30/07/2010 This case is reported in the October 2010 ‘Recent Developments’ in Legal Action. It is an interesting case on the use of applications under Schedule 11, 21(3) Housing and Regeneration Act 2008 to have a period of tolerated trespasser-hood treated as a continuous tenancy with [...]

Read more

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 3