Archive for March 2009

Comments Off

Tenants – the forgotten victims of repossession

29 Mar 2009 By Tessa Shepperson Housing Law

I was delighted to read a report that a campaign is being launched to help tenants who get evicted through no fault of their own, because their buy-to-let landlords have not kept up their mortgage payments. You can read more about it on the Citizens Advice Bureau site here.
Long term LandlordLaw Blog readers [...]

Related posts:

  1. Advice for landlords whose tenants are not paying rent
  2. More tenants evicted by landlords mortgagees
  3. Good news for tenants – receivers of rent now eight times more likley

Read more

Comments Off

A dutiful cousin

26 Mar 2009 By Francis Davey Housing Law

The House of Lords have again considered the nature and extent of proprietary estoppel in Thorner v Majors [2009] UKHL 18. Regular readers will recall we discussed their decision in Yeoman’s Row Management Limited (Appellants) and another v Cobbe (Respondent) [2008] UKHL 55 in August last year.
Picture this: a large farm in Somerset owned by [...]

Read more

Comments Off

Improvements, rent and former long leaseholders – a nasty loophole

25 Mar 2009 By Francis Davey Housing Law

The recent case of Hughes v Borodex Ltd [2009] EWHC 565 (Admin) illustrates a pitfall that may face the very small number of former long leaseholders who have become assured tenancies as a result of the Local Government and Housing Act 1989 (”the 1989 Act”).
Mrs Hughes had been the tenant under a lease that was [...]

Read more

Comments Off

A Weaver v L&Q interlude.

25 Mar 2009 By Nearly Legal Housing Law

While we wait for the Court of Appeal judgment in Weaver v London & Quadrant – the case was heard in the last week of February, I believe – we have a judgment along the way, specifically on Weaver’s application for a protected costs order (PCO). It is tempting to see this as something of [...]

Read more

Comments Off

Judicial Review costs

25 Mar 2009 By Nearly Legal Housing Law

Mendes & Anor v Southwark LBC (2009) CA (Civ Div) 24/03/09 [not on Bailii], is a useful case for those representing JR claimants. The report is on Lawtel.
Southwark had made an erroneous decision on Mr Mendes’ eligibility for housing assistance under Part VII. Mr Mendes applied for permission for judicial review. Before the matter went [...]

Read more

Comments Off

Appealing reasonableness decisions

21 Mar 2009 By Nearly Legal Housing Law

This is the first of two appeals on Ground 16 possession claims which came out today, both concerning whether it was reasonable to make a possession order. The second will be up later on.
Bracknell Forest Borough Council v Harry Green & Denise Green [2009] EWCA Civ 238 centred on the consideration of the availability of [...]

Read more

Comments Off

Without Prejudice acknowledgment of title?

18 Mar 2009 By Nearly Legal Housing Law

Ofulue v Bossert [2009] UKHL 16 was an adverse possession case – we commented on the Court of Appeal hearing here, and that post gives the background. There was an appeal to the House of Lords which was primarily concerned with the limitation period of adverse possession. This is a late and brief report because [...]

Read more

Comments Off

Leasehold update

13 Mar 2009 By J@nearlylegal Housing Law

A couple of things to leave you with on a Friday afternoon.
Leaseholders who are dissatisfied with the management of their properties are entitled to apply to a Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT) for the appointment of a manager – Part 3, Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. The LVT may appoint a manager in a number of [...]

Read more

Comments Off

Progress

13 Mar 2009 By Nick Holmes FreeLegalWeb

A small group has been actively progressing the FreeLegalWeb agenda. Here’s an update on our progress:
Active people:

With me, Robert Casalis…

Read more

Comments Off

Legal informatics – a big world

9 Mar 2009 By Nick Holmes FreeLegalWeb

Tom Bruce, co-founder and director of the Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School posts an interesting piece on the…

Read more

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 2