Archive for February 2010

Comments Off

Unlawful Eviction, exemplary damages and why people don’t like estate agents

28 Feb 2010 By Nearly Legal Housing Law

Islam v Yap and Others. Claim No: TLQ/09/1130. High Court, 20 November 2009.
This was a claim for unlawful eviction and a tale worthy of a play by Ben Jonson. There were no less than 5 defendants, and such superfluity necessitates an opening description of the nature and the character of the dramatis personae:
Mrs Islam – a [...]

Read more

Comments Off

Case Comment: Norris v Government of United States of America [2010] UKSC 9

28 Feb 2010 By UKSC blog Human Rights Law

In the case of Norris v Government of the United States ([2010] UKSC 9) In the absence of any real guidance from Strasbourg the Supreme Court was called upon to determine the correct approach to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights in …

Read more

Comments Off

Right of residence and children in education

26 Feb 2010 By Nearly Legal Housing Law

LB Harrow v Ibrahim C‑310/08 on reference from the Court of Appeal (LB Harrow v Ibrahim and another [2008] EWCA Civ 386. Our note here).
The question was whether:
(a) children of EU citizens who have installed themselves in a member state during the exercise by their parents of rights as residence as workers in that state [...]

Read more

Comments Off

R on the application of Gaines-Cooper v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 83

25 Feb 2010 By UKSC blog Tax Law

As the Blog reported at the time, on 16 February 2010, the Court of Appeal (Ward, Dyson and Moses LJJ) released its decision in the joined cases of R on the application of Davies (and another) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & C…

Read more

Comments Off

Tenancy Deposits on Sale and Rent Back on Appeal

24 Feb 2010 By David Smith Housing Law

The Court of Appeal has ruled on a Sale and Rent Back matter and on its connection to Tenancy Deposit Protection.

Read more

Comments Off

OFT v Foxtons- The Final Order

23 Feb 2010 By PainSmith Housing Law

The final sealed order in the OFT v Foxtons case has been made available on the OFT website. A copy can be found here. This order gives effect to the judgement of the High Court and is now the final word on the matter as Foxtons have withdrawn their …

Read more

Comments Off

Foxtons case concluded – now is the time for agents to review their agency agreements

23 Feb 2010 By Tessa Shepperson Housing Law

I have just learned that a final order has been made in the case of the Office of Fair Trading v. Foxtons, which I have written about in the past (see here).
Foxtons have now made ‘significant changes’ to its standard terms and conditions which have satisfied the OFT
‘including making the liability to pay renewal commission [...]

Read more

Comments Off

‘Ard en fast rule*

20 Feb 2010 By J@nearlylegal Housing Law

James v Birmingham City Council [2010] EWHC 282 (Admin) is a further dispute about the power of the court to vary an ASBO.
A magistrates court may make and ASBO against any person over the age of 10 if it can be proved (to the criminal standard of proof, using the civil rules of evidence) that [...]

Read more

Comments Off

Proprietary Estoppel: Detriment and Remedy in the Privy Council

18 Feb 2010 By Dave@nearlylegal Housing Law

In Henry and Mitchell v Henry [2010] UKPC 3, the Privy Council have given further consideration to the doctrine of proprietary estoppel.  The judgment of the PC was delivered by Sir Jonathan Parker and it will be of particular interest as it demonstrates the continuing importance of the Court of Appeal’s excellent judgment in Gillett [...]

Read more

Comments Off

Missing letters, Reviews and Determinations of Civil Rights

18 Feb 2010 By Nearly Legal Housing Law

Tomlinson & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2010] UKSC 8
This is the Supreme Court judgment on the appeal from the Court of Appeal of what was then called Ali & Ibrahim v Birmingham City Council [2008] EWCA 1228 [our report here]. At issue was whether the Housing Act 1996 s.202 review and s.204 appeal [...]

Read more

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 5